» Comics - A Quite Different Perspective: 5 - November 20th, 2010, 11:00 am

Average Rating: 5.00
ยป Comics - A Quite Different Perspective: 5 - November 20th, 2010, 11:00 am

     Average Rating: 5.00




Zman , November 20th, 2010, 10:12 am

Even Amy can't stand Amy.

As for the issue at hand discussed thoroughly in the previous page, a lot of people thought that this would somehow cause a temporal paradox. This isn't true, as we're not dealing with temporal mechanics, but instead dimensional mechanics. Hypothetically time travel could be involved (though not in this case,) but only because a particular dimension is either further forward or lagging behind the universe that the traveller originates from. But, because they're still separate dimensions, neither the original's past, nor destination's future will be effected in any sort of way that would break the laws of time.


Be sure to read Apple's comic so you know what the hell is going on.


Zman , July 23rd, 2018, 2:33 am

Post A Comment

jameswolf100 , November 20th, 2010, 11:05 am

PARADOX!!!!AND AMYS TO STUPID TO KNOW IT.The Amy from this comic not a Quite Different

Ultimate the Hedgehog , November 20th, 2010, 11:13 am


ClareSilver47 , November 20th, 2010, 11:30 am

oh lol, that's pretty good

AvoryAzion , November 20th, 2010, 12:32 pm


Samurai pizza hedgehog , November 20th, 2010, 12:33 pm

and this is why we have SolarisParadox the lord of the timestream

fangirl65 , November 20th, 2010, 12:59 pm

holy ra two amys it it .....(shot)XD

13yaroza , November 20th, 2010, 1:09 pm


The_mad_one , November 20th, 2010, 3:20 pm

These paradox remarks are getting tiresome...

First of all:

Paradox = something impossible

'Something impossible' means it doesn't happen

So no massive explosions, implosions, end of the universe or anything. It doesn't happen. If it does happen, it's not a paradox. (Not saying im-/explosions are impossible, but they're not paradoxes)


These are Amies from different dimensions, they are not the same Amy, they are not the other's past so they cannot change their pasts (which would not happen anyway...) through the other Amy.


So many people said paradox now, what's the point in repeating? D:

rakshata , November 20th, 2010, 3:34 pm

true, no paradox occurs because it is possible for two beings to have exactly the same DNA in the world, it's just extremely unlikely. But still, TV has conditioned us to see any double instances of a being to be a paradox.

Mix , November 20th, 2010, 3:49 pm

dem eyebrows.

Delta-Pangaea , November 20th, 2010, 4:34 pm

First: 'Twas fun to rant.

Second: Lawl, Anime-fall.


CyFox09 (Guest) , November 20th, 2010, 7:24 pm

My reasoning why a paradox isn't possible
Now I, for one, KNOW that htis is not a paradox. As explained above, each Amy is from a different dimension, NOT from different points in the same dimension's timeline. It's entirely possible for two of the same person, each from alternate dimensions, to meet without causing any sort of backlash, as they are fundmentally different people. Therefore, there can be no paradox here.

pat15 , November 20th, 2010, 10:39 pm

It's also impossible to time travel to the PAST apparently

rakshata , November 20th, 2010, 11:13 pm

well, it isn't impossible to go back in time, you just can't do anything there but observe, unless the events have absolutely nothing to do with the reasonyou tiem traveled, or affect you at the exact milisecond you traveled abck in time.

kevansevans , November 21st, 2010, 2:55 am

Omg, rotflol.... cosplay.... lol
And as for the people who think that there is going to be a paradox... STFU AND GTFO.

SF3P0X1 , November 21st, 2010, 4:33 am

Some people will argue that a paradox is possible because each dimension runs on the same timeline.

Those people are idiots.

InfiniteRemnant , November 21st, 2010, 7:52 am

to share the same timeline would require this to be a splinter universe of the one she left, in which she didn't leave, and even then she would still need to be at a point in time BEFORE the two diverged which she is clearly not as events she doesn't know about have transpired.

Inferno the Fox (Guest) , November 21st, 2010, 7:55 am

I KNOW It's not a paradox, cuz, according to Back to the Future, the world would have ceased to exist right about now.
And I'm still here! I think...

InfiniteRemnant , November 21st, 2010, 7:57 am

back to the furure has more logic errors in it's interpretation of time travel than all of startrek. not a good example to use.

Inferno the Fox (Guest) , November 21st, 2010, 12:09 pm

@ InfiniteRemnant
I know that, but I saw all three movies a few days ago, and after I saw them, I said, "And I thought the plotline for Sonic '06 was confusing!" So, yeah, I just thought it was funny.

Hero of Comedy , November 21st, 2010, 1:09 pm

I was kidding you about the shelter dimension.
Those of you who didn't run are smart,
the rest of you are numbskulls.

Sparky The Fox , November 21st, 2010, 9:14 pm

"Ah... Hello cosplaying fangirl?" Lol~ Thats just, HAlarous~

Harrow , November 22nd, 2010, 4:21 pm

Youse guys are sillies.

Random Geek (Guest) , November 22nd, 2010, 5:08 pm

Wow. I'm amazed that a whole debate on temporal paradoxes is being taken into account without even the mention of physics.

yet another reader (Guest) , November 23rd, 2010, 3:05 pm

I think 'The Hichhikers Guide to the Galaxy' put it best:
You can not change the past. All of the important changes have already been made before you went back and made them, and it all sorts itself out in the end like a jigsaw puzzle.

and yes, I know this is dimentional paradox, not a temporal paradox.
I just wanted to clear up this misconception.

artistafrustrado , February 2nd, 2011, 3:11 pm

pfft hahahahaha "cosplay fangirl" XDD damn the DF amy is dumber than an army of knux xD

Pranksterganster (Guest) , September 17th, 2016, 1:23 pm


Post A Comment

Powered by Smackjeeves.com || Site design by Enkida || Further edited by Exer